One good thing about autumn arriving and
the kids going back to school is that we get a few decent television programmes
coming back on our screens after all the boring summer repeats. Why is it that they think it is not worth
putting any good programmes on in the summer months – I know we are meant to be
out in the garden more so they think it may well be wasted to put perfectly
good programmes on in the summer but I am sure we all watch some television in
the summer, especially with the summer we have had this year. We have had very few evenings that we would
have wanted to spend them outside for the whole evening and so we would all
expect to watch some television each night.
I don’t know about you but I never ever watch any programmes when they
are actually broadcast. I only ever
watch programmes I have recorded earlier or on a different day. It is so much easier to just record all I
want to watch on Series Timer so that I never miss watching or remembering to
record them. So all I have to do is
watch what I want when I want. Sorry
advertisers but you are a thing of the past to me as I have a nice button on my
remote that I can press which cuts the adverts out. Well I am saying “I” – what I really should
be saying is “he” because us women are rarely allowed to touch the remote –
LOL. Why is it that men want to have so
much control over the TV remote??? And
why, when the programme has finished do they feel this absolute need to flick
through all the channels afterwards???
If there had been anything else we had wanted to watch / record we would
have seen it in the TV magazine. But it
is this inbuilt desire to just check in case they are missing something. Personally I wish he would also do that
(check in case he has missed something) when he is meant to be washing up, as
anything that isn’t immediately by the sink doesn’t get washed up and I have
given up asking him why he didn’t turn round and scan the kitchen before he
thought he had finished. What I can’t
understand is how he misses things when he has meant to have included wiping
the worktops down in his washing up routine.
You can’t tell me he lifted up the offending unwashed items, cleaned the
surface and then put them back down again to forget.
------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo------------
Back to television programmes – we have
been watching The Killing. It is weird –
somehow sort of dark and shady (I mean the filming, not the plot). It is also very unrealistic in how the police
are working the case and the people in it.
Has the lead detective given in her notice or not, how come she can
leave her teenage son on his own and not get him taken away by social services
(in fact he was actually staying with a social worker!!!) and then his mum took
him to a motel and dumped him to go to work.
It brings into dispute so many things – the detective, the social
worker, the 2nd detective who takes drugs and dresses like he is
undercover etc. It has spent an awful
lot of the 13 episodes prolonging the plight of the grief stricken parents of
the girl who was killed which is the basis of the whole story, a story which
could have been told in a two hour programme.
They have included exactly why police officers shouldn’t (and wouldn’t
in real life) give out information to the parents as to who they think it may
be before they have confirmed the killer and have definite proof, so that the
father doesn’t beat an innocent man senseless and leave him fighting for his
life in hospital. This weeks episode
could have been missed out altogether as we would have missed nothing about the
story. This week the mum detective had a
call from the school to say the son (who was left on his own all the time
anyway) had not been to school for 3 days.
So suddenly the whole episode goes off from rushing around trying to
find the girls killer to spending the whole day trying to find the detectives
son who, although he hadn’t been at school for 3 days, had been going home as
though nothing was amiss (has she heard of truancy? and does she just drop the job in hand to
find him?). There was no danger or urgency
seeing as he hadn’t disappeared but had just not been at school. Wouldn’t the normal thing had been to wait
until he came home that day??? But no,
just drop everything in this urgent murder case to spend the whole episode
looking for the son as if he had gone missing and was in danger. Guess what, where do you think he had been –
to see his father. Now if I was him and
my mum was abandoning me for hours on end at all times of day and night, I
think I would have gone to see my father too – he can’t possibly be a worse
parent than his mother. Anyway as bad as
the series has been, it has been interesting enough to make me watch each
episode, so next time it is a double episode to finish the series. That is another strange thing they do on TV –
why a double episode, not that I mind, but I just wonder why they do that.
------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo------------
I did watch Doc Martin last night – I am
so pleased that has come back on our screens as it is a great programme and
makes me chuckle. For some reason Martin
Clunes seems to be one of those actors that people love or hate, and I think he
is great. The people who wont watch the
programme just because he is in it are missing a brilliant programme.
------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo------------
LOL – and for todays startling piece of
trivia:
The first couple
to be shown in bed together on prime time TV was Fred and Wilma Flintstone
And for todays chuckle:
Best speeding excuse ever:
When asked by a young patrol officer "Do you know you were
speeding?"
This 83-year-old woman gave the young officer an ear to ear smile and stated:
"Yes, but .... I had to get there before I forgot where I was going."
The officer put his ticket book away and bid her good day.
Makes perfectly good sense to me.
This 83-year-old woman gave the young officer an ear to ear smile and stated:
"Yes, but .... I had to get there before I forgot where I was going."
The officer put his ticket book away and bid her good day.
Makes perfectly good sense to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment